you're reading...
agenda, America, bloggers, communism, Constitution, hoplophobia, progressive, stand your ground, The Republic

Stand Your Ground!

Robb Allen (of Sharp As A Marble) speaks the truth:

It takes an evil mind …To claim you must run away, turning you back on someone who wants to harm you, first before being allowed to defend yourself.

WORD.He states further:

This isn’t based on logic or reason, but rather an emotional response where person A requires person B to pay the price for person A’s need to feel vindicated for their life choices.

Isn’t this the prime description defining the difference between  modern liberal/progressive/socialist/statist thought, and conservative/libertarian/individual-rights/less government based thought?

That, and in the U.S. Constitution it statespromote the general welfare’, not ‘shove our agenda down your throat because we know better than you and we feel like it‘!

It’s as though the difference is principles versus feelings.

You should go and read Robb’s take.  Daily.

About guffaw1952

I'm a child of the 50's. libertarian, now medically-retired. I've been a certified firearms trainer, a private investigator, and worked for a major credit card company for almost 22 years. I am a proud NRA Life Member. I am a limited-government, free-market capitalist, who believes in the U.S. Constitution and the Rule of Law.


10 thoughts on “Stand Your Ground!

  1. I once read a comment from someone in Tulsa, OK. Violent criminal activity is appropriate in today’s world, and an armed citizen resisting is, at a minimum, an OSHA violation.

    Posted by WellSeasonedFool | July 31, 2013, 8:07 am
  2. I’ve started calling these ‘things’ “Run Away Laws” – because that is what they really are – and the part they are refusing to admit is that the ‘duty’ to escape in its final analysis REQUIRES the victim to NOT fight back.

    WSF – I can actually see a criminal (and his attorney) filing suit for an OSHA violation if they get shot because the intended victim created a ‘hostile work environment’. Hmmm perhaps that ‘rationale’ is what the dept. of (in)justice used to call the Ft. Hood massacre a simple case of ‘workplace’ violence. Perhaps name deleted will try to use that as part of his defense – ‘but judge, I was only crying out against a hostile woke environment’……….

    Posted by GomeznSA | July 31, 2013, 8:48 am
  3. I would submit the criminal “created” the hostile work environment, and I was then only responding to the changed condition. Of course, that assumes said criminal actually survived my ‘response’.

    Posted by Rev. Paul | July 31, 2013, 8:54 am
  4. Just what I want to do – turn my back on someone behaving in a threatening manner so that I can be hit from behind and without the ability to parry or dodge.

    Posted by ProudHillbilly | July 31, 2013, 9:15 am
  5. Yep good read, and also great point! “I” will not turn my back on a threat… sorry… NOT!

    Posted by Old NFO | July 31, 2013, 5:05 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

"Round up the usual suspects."

In Loving Memory…

%d bloggers like this: