you're reading...
'only ones', agenda, anti-gun, appearance, Bill of Rights, class warfare, crime, gun control, politics

Dems Push to Disenfranchise The Poor Further!

A pair of Democratic lawmakers are proposing steep new taxes on handguns and ammunition, and tying the revenues to programs aimed at preventing gun violence.

Called the “Gun Violence Prevention and Safe Communities Act,” the bill sponsored by William Pascrell, D-N.J., and Danny Davis, D-Ill., would nearly double the current 11 percent tax on handguns, while raising the levy on bullets and cartridges from 11 percent to 50 percent.

“This bill represents a major investment in the protection of our children and our communities, and reflects the long-term societal costs of gun and ammunition purchases in our country,” Pascrell said.

The lawmakers say the bill would generate $600 million per year, which would be used to fund law-enforcement and gun violence prevention.  (Fox News) (emphasis Guffaw)

So the poor, who have trouble daily hand-to-mouth, are now to be saddled with the further inability to defend themselves, their homes and families?

I thought the Democrats were all about helping the poor?  Oh, that’s right, they’re all about making them dependent on government.  I forgot.

Don’t they remember poll taxes?  And how Black folks were not allowed to vote unless they could pay a substantial fee?  This sounds like a smokepole tax, to me!

Fortunately, the prospect for this monstrosity passing is dim.

About guffaw1952

I'm a child of the 50's. libertarian, now medically-retired. I've been a certified firearms trainer, a private investigator, and worked for a major credit card company for almost 22 years. I am a proud NRA Life Member. I am a limited-government, free-market capitalist, who believes in the U.S. Constitution and the Rule of Law.


5 thoughts on “Dems Push to Disenfranchise The Poor Further!

  1. What the elected critters say is entirely irrelevant, as is whatever “coverage” (ahem) the media provides (or doesn’t provide, as the case may be). Only what the unintended consequences matter.

    Grumblegrumblegrumble grrrrr…

    Posted by Rev. Paul | August 30, 2013, 8:32 am
  2. We passed that law in Iowa 3 years ago. But we called it “Shall issue.”

    Posted by jdrush | August 30, 2013, 12:39 pm
  3. I wouldn’t be surprised if this wasn’t done by EO, just sayin…

    Posted by Old NFO | August 30, 2013, 4:58 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

"Round up the usual suspects."

In Loving Memory…

%d bloggers like this: