Or, at least, a sniveling 14%!
from Wirecutter…
PoliceOne, a private organization with 450,000 members (380,000 full-time active law enforcement and 70,000 retired), polled its members in 2013 shortly after the Newtown, Conn., massacre. Eighty percent of respondents said allowing legally armed citizens to carry guns in places such as Newtown and Aurora would have reduced the number of casualties. Another 6 percent thought the presence of legally armed civilians would “likely” have prevented the innocent casualties altogether.
According to police and prosecutors, there have been dozens of cases of permit holders clearly stopping what would have been mass public shootings. It’s understandable these killers avoid places where they can’t kill a large number of people.
FROM HERE
Because so-called ‘gun free’ zones work so well…
_______________________________________________________
22 VETERANS COMMIT SUICIDE DAILY
Even ONE of these heroes making this choice is unacceptable! (Day #16 of 22)
Guffaw in AZ 
Victim disarmament zones work so well, that they’re practically non-existent up here. School grounds, bars, and polling places are the exceptions, and almost all are easily avoidable. I’m still amazed that at the complacency exhibited by the sheeple, who won’t say anything about self-protection.
Posted by Rev. Paul | June 18, 2016, 9:45 amAh, now you’re going to confuse emotions with reality… No fair… 🙂
Posted by Old NFO | June 18, 2016, 3:51 pm