My dear friend Borepatch posts:
Control of the Presidential Election
The headline reads “Homeland Security to Take Charge of Election.” My first thought was, well, sure, they did such a great job at the airports, why not?
There’s certainly security issues with the elections, clear problems with unauthorized voting, tallies that make no sense, and the possibility that the outcome in a state could be compromised by computer.
Consolidating the election into a singe system means a single point of failure. You could easily have multiple, overlapping intrusions skewing the results and those intrusion could come from both internal and external actors.
“Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.”— Josef Stalin
Let’s see…
An administration rife with corruption, political double-dealing, and outright crime, criminals (and communists) decides without input from the People or the States that they are to oversee the election.
What could possibly go wrong?
Advertisements
No way – no how.
Putting the Feds in charge of pretty much anything would be laughable if it wasn’t so despicable.
Posted by KM | September 19, 2016, 11:04 amA ballot box controlled by despicables?
Posted by guffaw1952 | September 19, 2016, 11:10 amAnd the level of cheat just went up… sigh
Posted by Old NFO | September 19, 2016, 2:57 pmTo 110% voter turnout. No ID required…
Posted by guffaw1952 | September 19, 2016, 3:13 pm