archives

politics

This category contains 193 posts

We All Make Mistakes

I’m a tough taskmaster.  Especially on myself.  I recognize my foibles, and as soon as I do make a mistake I attempt to make amends to those whom I have wronged.

I’m certain not perfect at it.

Progress, not perfection, I’m told.

I just cannot wrap my head around those who not only would attempt to control us, but then take no responsibility for their actions.  I don’t understand what must go through the heads of despots and dictators.

Imagine if Stalin or Pol Pot or Hitler (or Woodrow Wilson or FDR) had used their force for good instead of evil?!

Then I see THIS (from Brock Townsend):

Mother of Benghazi Victim: Hillary ‘Ought to Be Wearing Stripes,’ ‘My Son Is Dead Because of Her’

Via Billy

https://i1.wp.com/media.breitbart.com/media/2016/04/Smith-418-Thumbnail-200x150.jpg

Patricia Smith, whose son, Sean, was killed in the September 11, 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya said that Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “ought to be wearing stripes” and “My son is dead because of her” on Monday’s “Varney & Co.” on the Fox Business Network.

Smith said, “My feeling is that she went on TV afterwards, telling everybody that I was the liar, that there’s someone here that is lying, and it wasn’t her, and that I was liar. I want her to apologize to me for calling me a liar on TV, because this is clearly not true. And I want to know why my son was left to die breathing in diesel smoke, which is the most horrible way to die, and she didn’t do anything to stop it. She could have.”

More @ Breitbart
How much of a sociopath does one have to be to be responsible for the murder or incarceration of millions, to then go home, have a nice evening meal and retire for the evening?
And if they were responsible for the deaths of only four?
And then, to personally attack the veracity of a victim’s mother, instead of being contrite and apologizing.
What is WRONG with these people?

Political Correctness @ Arlington

(from Free North Carolina)
confed arlington

The PC police have found a new target.  Not satisfied with monuments and flags, the Maryland general assembly recently voted to alter the lyrics to the official State song, James Ryder Randall’s “Maryland, My Maryland.”  Lincoln apologist Christian McWhirter penned a piece for Time magazine that labeled the song “dissident.”  This is true if using the standard definition of the word, opposition to official policy, especially that of an authoritarian state.  Anti-Hitler Germans were dissidents.

George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Sam Adams, and the rest of the founding generation were dissidents.  Anti-Lenin and anti-Stalin Russians were dissidents.  Demonstrators at Tiananmen Square were dissidents.  It seems dissidents are those usually on the right side of history.  Obviously McWhirter disagrees.

Gee.  Time magazine.  Who knew?

American Industrial Ingenuity

Brought to you by the PRC (Communist China)

Via Billy and Free North Carolina

Cadillac XTS China REUTERSKim Kyung-Hoon.

General Motors is hiring Chinese workers to build Cadillac autos that will be sold to the American taxpayers who bailed the company out in 2008.

The plug-in hybrid version of the CT6, which is already manufactured in China, will be available in American showrooms this summer, according to Bloomberg News.
There is growing criticism about General Motors’ decision to hire Chinese workers for manufacturing jobs after accepting a huge bailout from American taxpayers. “America invested in GM and GM turned around and stabbed America in the back,” Rick Manning, the president of Americans for Limited Government, told Breitbart News.   
Breitbart has already reported on GM’s plan to sell the made-in-China Buick Envision in the United States. 
Business mogul Donald Trump has made U.S. trade policies with countries like China a central theme of his populist campaign.
More @ Breitbart
Hey, we GAVE them the money, right?  So whose fault is it that more American jobs are moving offshore?
(In the interest of full disclosure, I own a pre-bailout GM car.  The bad news she’s a 2000 Olds Intrigue, with over 140k miles on her.  The good news is in spite of the fact I cannot afford to maintain her, she still runs.  Kind-of.)

The President Visits Cuba

And opens a can of gusanos*.

In an effort to further ‘normalize’ relations between our two countries, the President (and his family) landed in Cuba, yesterday.

(I think the last Chief Executive to visit was Warren Harding…?)

Of course, it was President Kennedy, at the height of the Cold War, who stopped trade and most legal interaction with the communist country, in an effort to starve the influence of the Soviet Union from her shores.

Apparently, his efforts have finally failed.

As a libertarian (small L) I see the value in free trade with all nations.  As a person who detests communism, and the millions of lives it has taken and imprisoned, I’m ‘reluctant’ to further engage the Castro regime, to say the least.

In the last century we fought both Germany and Japan – now they are both (relatively) free nations with which we engage travel and trade.  We fought North Korea – still divided from the South, and still a real danger.  U.S. citizens may travel in the South.  Vietnam, which used to be North and South, is now another tourist destination and trading partner.  And while we never officially fought the Soviet Union and China, one is now an oligarchy, and the other a remains a communist oligarchy.

And our largest trade partner and wholesale banker.  Yes, The People’s Republic of China (aka Red China or the PRC) totes our note!

And ALL of these nations, whether fascist or communist, took political prisoners, executed millions, and stole private wealth and property, all in the name of the State.  (And many continue to…)

And many welcomed to their shores terrorists, spies and criminals as well, and sponsored terrorism, espionage and crime abroad.  In the ‘free’ world including most pointedly The United States.

Which brings me to my point.

Is it reasonable to continue to treat Cuba as a redheaded stepchild, sequestered in the Caribbean closet away from other nations, because of their bad behavior, when we welcome nations like the PRC to bring their substandard goods and poisonous pet food to our shores?

And make them our bankers?

When the PRC has killed and imprisoned millions?

Should we view the normalization of relations with Cuba as evolutionary – this is how things go?  Or as Fabian evolution – well, we’re friends with other totalitarian regimes, we might as well add Cuba to the list.  It might take generations.

Until we ourselves are swallowed-up in the Fabian-socialist-communist-progressive Leviathan that is the State knows better than the individual?

Or is it already too late for this debate?

*Spanish for worm – what Fidel called those who escaped his revolution

PS – In a disgustingly humorous note, Raul Castro did not meet the President after he landed.  A slight to be sure.  And later the President spoke in front of a huge likeness of Ernesto Che’ Guevara, a hero of the Cuban people (well, at least the communist ones).  Che’ was an infamous bigot and murderer, who wrote extensively about Black people being inferior.

che

 

Death, Or Hanging

There was a recent ‘news’ item regarding the ‘debate’ over gun control policy between Secretary of State Clinton and Senator Sanders.

To wit (in part):

Sanders and Clinton clash over guns at debate

Caitlin Dickson

Breaking News Reporter
March 6, 2016

FLINT, Mich. — One of the more heated moments at the CNN-MLive.com debate here Sunday came after moderator Anderson Cooper turned the floor over to Gene Kopf, whose 14-year-old daughter, Abigail, was critically injured in an Uber driver’s shooting spree on Feb. 20, which left six dead in Kalamazoo, Mich.

Kopf asked what Democratic presidential primary candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders would do to crack down on mass shootings, adding that he didn’t “want to hear anything about tougher laws for mental health or criminal backgrounds, because that doesn’t work.” Kopf noted that Jason Dalton, the man who was charged with the shooting that nearly killed his daughter, “had no mental health issues recorded, and had a clear background.”

Clinton began by saying, “We have to try everything that works to try to limit the numbers of people and the kinds of people who are given access to firearms,” and she agreed with Kopf that “not every killer will have the same profile.”

But, she continued, “I also believe, so strongly, Gene, that giving immunity to gunmakers and sellers was a terrible mistake.” Clinton was referring to the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which protects gun manufacturers and sellers from being held liable when their products are used to commit crimes.

Sanders, Clinton pointed out, voted in favor of that bill when it passed in 2005.

“No other industry in America has absolute immunity … and they sell products all the time that cause harm,” Clinton said. “You talk about corporate greed? The gun manufacturers sell guns to make as much money as they can make.”
Her comment drew sustained applause.

Cooper piggybacked on Clinton’s reference to the gun immunity law, noting that the “families of Sandy Hook victims announced that they are going to sue Remington, who made the AR-15, which was used in the Newtown massacre,” but that the law Sanders supported was likely to prevent them from doing so.

“Tonight, what do you say to those families?” Cooper asked Sanders.

“Well, this is what I say, if I understand it — and correct me if I’m wrong. If you go to a gun store and you legally purchase a gun, and then, three days later, if you go out and start killing people, is the point of this lawsuit to hold the gun-shop owner or the manufacturer of that gun liable?”

Simply put, Sanders argued, illegal gun sales are one thing, but he doesn’t believe that manufacturers should be held responsible for a crime committed with a product that someone purchased legally.

“I think what you do is you hold those people who have used the gun accountable. You try to make guns as safe as possible,” Sanders said.

The sort of liability regulation that Clinton supports would be too onerous and potentially threaten gun manufacturing, said the senator from Vermont. Sanders campaign has made the decline in manufacturing jobs in the United States a major area of focus, and he and Clinton have clashed repeatedly on the gun issue over the course of the campaign.

“What you’re really talking about is ending gun manufacturing in America,” said Sanders. “I don’t agree with that.”

I’m probably preaching to the choir here, but to me it sounds like Hitler and Mussolini debating who gets possession of Ethiopia.  A Progressive versus a Socialist.  Splitting hairs comes to mind…

Can you imagine such a discussion regarding The First Amendment?  Which books, blogs, films, and periodicals could be limited or eliminated?  Or publishers?

Bill And Hill Are Just Poor Folk

clinton_top-600The Clinton’s reportedly made $76,000 per day last year!

https://t.co/IFzMU0j7Fp

— FOX & Friends (@foxandfriends) February 11, 2016

I Thought We Were Staying Away From This?

The US Army has awarded 17 companies, including major corporations, $900 million in contracts for logistics and service support for biological and chemical war projects, the Department of Defense announced.

WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — The companies, including the Battelle Memorial Institute of Columbus, Ohio and the Camber Corp. of Huntsville, Alabama “were awarded a $900 million… contract to the Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense,” the announcement said on Tuesday.The other companies receiving contracts were Aktarius, Allied Technical Services, AQuate II, Axseum Solutions; KD Analytical Consulting, Murtech, Omega Consultants, SciTech Services, DRS Technical Services, STS International, Engility, Leidos, Patricio Enterprises and SAIC Corp., it said.

The United States faces current and emerging chemical and biological threats and requires integrated defenses against them, but currently those responsibilities are split among 26 different Defense Department agencies, according to an August 2015 US Government Accountability Office report.

Even if these are ‘legal’, it begs the question:  Why?

Where/Who are the potential targets?  Is this just about ‘research’?  TWENTY-SIX companies?

h/t Sputnik International

I Am No Longer Shocked

I’ve posted numerous times in this blog regarding governmental malfeasance, lying, fraud and other misconduct.

Usually titled ‘I’m Shocked’, coupled with a photo of Claude Raines (as Captain Renault in the film Casablanca).  Youngsters, ask your parents – or watch a classic movie once-in-a-while!

Now, we come to THIS report (from Jeffrey in The Feral Irishman):

Great Tips For Your Next Infernal Revulsion Service Audit!

So the IRS funneled a kickback to a law firm that backed democratic candidates.  Microsoft and Congress demanded an investigation and the courts told the IRS to preserve all relevant information.  The IRS turns around and deliberately erases a hard drive central to the court ordered data protection.  Will anyone see jail time?  Will anyone be fired?  Will anyone be fined?  What’s the penalty for government bureaucrats when they break the law?

Another fine example of “one law for THEE and another law for ME”. Read the story HERE.
A big Hat/Tip to Alan in Cullman!
Between the ongoing crimes of Mrs. Clinton, the Administration and the above, I am no longer shocked.
Just disgusted.
P.S. – How do these people sleep at night?  If I make a mistake (and believe me, I make a bunch!) I’m usually quick to own up to it because the guilt and shame overtake me, otherwise.  Are they just shameless, or downright evil?

 

 

Lincoln Lenin

See what I did there?

Like most Baby Boomers raised in American public schools, I believed what I was told – that Washington was The Father of Our Country and Lincoln Preserved the Union and freed the slaves.

I still believe Washington was mostly good – the Whiskey Rebellion aside, but Lincoln is much more complicated.

An early statist and progressive?

Setting the stage for T.R. and Woodrow Wilson.  And then F.D.R., Clinton and Obama.

Just as the Fabian socialists wanted…

(From Brock Townsend)

The Seeds of American Communism

https://rosswolfe.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/fuckyeah.jpeg?w=458&h=360
 Lincoln, Lenin and Stalin: Communist Party USA meeting in Chicago, 1939

The full power of the War Department was utilized to secure Lincoln’s reelection in November 1864, according to Assistant Secretary of War Charles A. Dana. In early 1863 he was sent to spy on Grant to determine his acceptance of Radical ideals and thus suitable for higher command; it was Dana who ordered Jefferson Davis manacled in Fortress Monroe. As a young man Dana experimented with utopian fantasies at the infamous Brook Farm commune at West Roxbury, Massachusetts.
Bernhard Thuersam, http://www.Circa1865.com   The Great American Political Divide

The Seeds of American Communism

“. . . [O]ne notable European communist of 1848 who was a member of the Union Army was Maj. Robert Rosa [who was] an early member of the New York Communist Club. The following preamble of the [Club’s] constitution gives insights into the worldview of these early American communists:

“The members of Communist Club reject every religious belief, no matter in what guise it may appear . . . [and] recognize the perfect equality of all men, regardless of color and sex, and therefore they strive above all to abolish private property, inherited or accumulated . . . “

These early American socialists/communists did indeed reject accepted orthodox religion, but they maintained a near “religious” faith in their utopian dreams.

The very foundation of modern-day liberalism/socialism was laid by the many and various utopian ideologues of the nineteenth century. The fact that these utopian socialists/communists found Abraham Lincoln and the Republican Party to be objects worthy of their zeal and efforts speaks volumes as to why post-Appomattox America has adopted most if not all of the early American socialist/communist goals.

Universal suffrage was a dream of every socialist/communist movement in Europe and America; even Karl Marx spoke in favor of universal suffrage; the same can be said to be true about a progressive income tax, abolition of the rights of inheritance, a system of national education, centralized banking, and many other socialist/communist measures.

Socialism and communism did not come to these United States from Russia; these concepts were already well-known by many Northern intellectuals of the nineteenth century. The preponderance of communistic societies of the United States were located in Northern States before the war. According to Theodore Draper [author of Roots of American Communism] by 1923 most communists in America could be found in cities such as New York, Chicago, Boston, Minneapolis, Cleveland and Detroit. Note that we do not find Charleston, New Orleans or any other Southern city mentioned in the above listed cities.

The thought of Lincoln as the first American president to have had a communist sympathizer working in a key part of his administration is and should be shocking to all Americans. Charles Dana, who visited Karl Marx in 1848, was an associate of Horace Greeley and an early convert to the communistic Fourier movement. Dana served as assistant secretary of war under Edwin Stanton during the Lincoln administration, thus becoming the first communist, or at least the first communist sympathizer, to serve in high position within the government of the United States.

Be that as it may, the result of Lincoln’s victory over the South was to give the utopian dreamers a victory for big government. As a result, all Americans today are living in a nation far removed from that envisioned by the founding fathers. At this juncture there is one question that stands begging to be asked: “Can the adverse effects of the socialists’ victory at Appomattox be removed from this nation?”

(Red Republicans and Lincoln’s Marxists, Walter Kennedy & Al Benson, Jr., iUniverse, Inc., 2007, pp. 24-26)

Of course, this doesn’t mean that BIGGOV ideas were absent in the South, just that they lost.
And we all know who writes the history books.  At least those for public schools.

It’s Official – Pandora’s Box Is Now Open!

(and no inappropriate joke is intended here!)

Obama DOE: School Must Offer Mixed Sex Showers

Via sauced07

girl shower

The Obama Department of Education has ordered the Palatine school district to allow a male transgender student into the girls locker room and showers.
 

The DOE threatened to cut off funding if the transgender student was not given locker room privileges.

Enjoy the new rules, girls.

The Daily Caller reported:

Gee, I wonder how much more confusing THIS is going to get?  I, for one, feel if one is sexually-identity ‘confused’, one should seek counseling. OTOH, if there truly is a genetic issue (chromosomally-based, suggesting a surgical solution) that is another matter.  My understanding is the percentage of these folks is very small.
How many pubescent teens would like to see the other sex naked?  I’m guessing most of them.
The DOE threatened to cut off funding if the transgender student was not given locker room privileges.
Sound familiar?  Like threatening to cut off highway funds if the speed limits aren’t lowered, or certain traffic laws aren’t changed to conform an arbitrary federal standard?
Sounds like blackmail to me.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.[4] (Wikipedia)
Unless the Feds have an agenda they are pushing…
h/t Brock Townsend

"Round up the usual suspects."

In Loving Memory…

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 395 other followers