The esteemed David Hardy reports to us on the tweaking (twerking?) of the New York State SAFE Act…
Federal judge upholds NY SAFE Act, strikes part of magazine limit
Posted by David Hardy · 31 December 2013 05:20 PMStory here. He upheld the ban on magazines holding more than ten rounds, but struck down the provision banning putting more than seven rounds in one of them.
…and how many angels, again?
Who said better to be tried by twelve than carried by six?
Guffaw in AZ 
But he also suggested the state’s regulation of those weapons and magazines is related to an important governmental interest: public safety.
This judge apparently believes that, as Robb Allen put it, “Declawing the cat keeps it safe from other animals”.
Rochester Police Chief James M. Sheppard and his conclusion that assault weapons “are designed for one purpose – to efficiently kill numerous people.”
So….why do cops have them again? And that group of civilians are different from us how?
Unfreakinbelievable.
Posted by KM | January 3, 2014, 7:47 am“Unfreakinbelievable”
I couldn’t have said it better myself!
Posted by guffaw1952 | January 3, 2014, 7:54 am“Twerking” is appropriate here. Except that it only mimics the act when the citizen is literally getting screwed….
Posted by ProudHillbilly | January 3, 2014, 8:29 amAnd how sad we both know this?
Posted by guffaw1952 | January 3, 2014, 8:34 amConsidering that I don’t have TV other than Netflixs having knowledge like that is pretty sad….
Posted by ProudHillbilly | January 3, 2014, 2:27 pmHAHAHAHA!
Posted by guffaw1952 | January 3, 2014, 4:46 pmPathetic…
Posted by Old NFO | January 3, 2014, 8:51 pmYep.
Posted by guffaw1952 | January 3, 2014, 10:50 pm